Yall were engaged in the illegal SWATTING of a YT Creator cause she threatened your Delphi narrative. Not just her, multiple people illegally SWATTED. Holeman involved in terrorizing them as well. You guys are disgusting.

I wish Ainee would read the reviews to learn how she makes listeners feel. We’re not idiots but you treat us that way with All the over explaining you do. Knock it off!!

This is exactly why transparency is so important in the court system. The general public has been kept in the dark for so long & we naturally try to fill in the blanks in order to make sense of the investigation. If I had seen the entire BG video from the beginning and heard what transpired in court I wouldn’t be so confused by the different groups of media outlets. 😵‍💫 I believe people want to make educated & informed decisions based upon the facts and evidence. That’s not possible when we are only given a few bread crumbs from different sources with different perspectives. There are two sides to every story and the truth is often found somewhere in the middle. Being open minded and looking at everything from all sides is how we find the truth and that’s impossible without transparency

Very open conversation that’s non-biased from an attorney and a journalist. Thank you for your work!

I’ve listened very off and on through the years but with the Delphi coverage I’m listening much more regularly… these two are precious! I love them together 🧡

Dude literally has no idea what is heresay. Whatever online law degree he supposedly got should give him a refund. Embarrassing.

This show leaves me speechless. Nothing screams insecure like spending 1 minute and 12 seconds talking about how “unimportant” something is. And repeating 11 times back-to-back that there is nothing of importance sure portrays a different message than “nothing to see here.” I actually laughed out loud by the end of it. Perhaps they are trying to convince themselves 😅 I will, however, take their advice from the “Ricci Davis wreckage” episode and throw out everything they have to say since some of it isn’t credible! It’s so one-sided that I really can’t trust that I’m getting the full picture.

These 2 sold their souls for a book deal. Unprofessional. Biased. Not journalism. Listen to them to find out how NOT to do a podcast.

Love the pod, love your dynamic. Thank you for being one of the only credible reporters on the Delphi case. It kills me to continue to see Motta sycophants leaving 1-star reviews.

A polygraph is worth as much as a sheet of toilet paper, in my opinion. That might be why it’s not something that can be used in court,….so I don’t think you can call someone a liar, unless you have years of experience administering polygraph examinations.

Edmond Kemper should narrate your book!!

I hate to give 3 stars because I actually really like the hosts but the more I listen the more noticeable it is, or it's gotten worse, but Aine, please try to cut back on the rambling and repetition. I listened to an episode today that was 2 parts and there was absolutely no need for that as it could have been half as long without all the repeated feelings. Also heck, if you can't help yourself, go ahead and ramble but if you do that, take the time to edit to make it less boring and annoying. I know people have complained about other stuff but this really is the only complaint I have. Some said you have an annoying voice, I kind of feel like it isn't annoying at first then the more I hear you say the same thing over and over the more I can see why some people feel that way so I think you'd get more positive feedback with some editing.

Thanks for your work. I say this with love, my friends and I feel Anya (sp?) tends to lecture her audience and seems to be on a her high horse while repeating the same sentiment over and over. I wanted to point this out because I believe overall the podcast is interesting and I want to see you succeed. With a bit of tweaking it could be easily be 5 stars. I will continue to listen and adjust my rating accordingly if appropriate later. I can tell you’re working hard and podcasting is not easy so I am rooting for you both and hope the constructive criticism is helpful. Update- please let Kevin talk more and stop talking about “other” podcasters. While I agree, it’s time for Aine to get off the soap box PLEASE.

These 2 have really put in such a massive amount of work. Well done. It is above and beyond. The new Delphi first person interview series is excellent. So good. Thank you! However, it makes more sense to me that there was some form of contact between Richard Allen and Keegan Klein rather than 2 independent pedophiles targeting the same 2 girls at the exact same time. I don’t agree that Keegan Klein has any reason to establish his connection to Richard Allen. It’s a felony murder charge at best. I would think it would have potentially put the death penalty more firmly on the table for them both and possibly involved federal charges rather than helped Keegan Klein’s child sexual abuse material conviction. Also, tech seemed to be the Achilles heel in the investigation, so I don’t believe there is certainty about the communication on the devices seized or that 100% of all relevant device seizure is possible to know. Anyways, you guys are the best!

Garbage people, garbage podcast. You both should be ashamed of yourselves!

Talk about the facts not your biased opinions on the matter. Justice will be served.

Been listening for years and throughly enjoy Aine and Kevin. I have never been as happy to listen to an episode the hosts said would be a waste of my time as today (2.19.25). Aine was in top form. Kevin is there trying to keep her on track. They’re a great duo!

Great coverage of cases, however it’s extremely bias to what the hosts believe and they rarely go over the opposing view. Simply calling it “waste of time but we gotta cover this dumb thing we don’t agree with”

You guys are so great! Lots of research and compassion! These people that give bad reviews are just ridiculous! I’m sorry!

This used to be the place to go to find Delphi info. Now, it is a horrible podcast. Would love to see their financials and where the funding comes from. Particularly from ISP. They are a media wing of the police and prosecutors office.

Insightful and very considerate podcasters sharing facts and information! Love them! Thank you for your hard work.

Let me tell you, the shirts are top notch….the podcast, pretty good too

This is a podcast propping up the corrupt and illegal system installed in every little garbage town across America. Rules don’t matter, it’s just good old boys and these a-holes pushing a corrupt agenda. These are then enemies of the state. And proud of it. Soulless puppets.

This is a terrible podcast. I don’t know which one of them is worse and what’s WORSE they have 0 self awareness. The man is a civil right attorney! I would be scared if he was my lawyer. Also, I think I’d rather listen to RFK Jr speak for an hour than these nasally mutants.

I really enjoy this podcast, however, the amount of ads is ruining it. Listening to today’s episode, they did not start talking about the actual episode until 12 minutes in!!! That’s ridiculous!! Really sick and tired of listening to you guys read ads and then listen to other commercials on top of it, it’s WAY too much!!

I see why this got popular. People were hungry for information about the Delphi trial, and they offered way more info than was probably necessary. As a podcast, though, the editing is awful and the hosts are pretty unappealing in general. The female host says “um” so much, I couldn’t finish the episode I was listening to. The male host is condescending and smug for reasons I cannot figure out. Also, there are so,so,so many ads that are read terribly and go on and on and on. And finally, trying so hard to promote their book that I can only assume will be just as terrible as this podcast. This is a waste of time.

Putting themselves into the thick of it and not afraid of online bullies. All to bring the truth.

I just wanted to take a moment to thank you guys for content I can trust about a case that has been so unfortunately misrepresented and misreported in the media. I don’t listen to or read any other sources - you are it for me. You’re both intelligent, ethical, sincere, and loyal (to the girls, their families, and your audience). Your trial coverage and the first person interview series have been fantastic. I’ve been with you guys since you started covering Delphi and am looking forward to your book coming out!

Thank you for covering the Delphi case, your Podcast was the only one I listened to, knowing you’d do honest reporting. Your interview with Doug Carter after the trail was very enlightening & I wish him well in his retirement.

The intro music is WAY too long. I have to put the episodes on 2x otherwise too slow and boring. Don’t find them interesting to listen to. They go off on tangents.

I have never in my life left a review. I’ve been listening to Murder Sheet for quite a while. I used to work in news and have an interest in the Delphi murders. I was in the newsroom when we heard the girls went missing and the next day with that awful press conference announcing the murders. While I don’t always agree with everything they say, these post trial interviews are fantastic. I’m listening to the one with Doug Carter now. He just made a statement about the crime scene photo leak - said it’s for him to “die broken” seeing those images and not for regular people. I am gutted. What a testament to his service and glad I got to hear it. Keep up the good work.

Thank you Murder Sheet for this amazing & truthful coverage . What he said was so profound, how can anyone think negatively of him?!

It’s amazing to me that a non-practicing attorney (Kevin) — with limited practice experience and no experience as a litigator in major felony cases — has the gall to assert what is or is not proper for a practicing criminal attorney to do. Speaking as a practicing criminal lawyer, I don’t have the time or patience to be condescended to with the astounding level of uninformed smugness that permeates this podcast. I used to listen regularly, up until a couple months ago when this podcast went completely off the rails and lost any sense of decency or empathy. The hosts consistently attack other content creators for being biased internet “cranks,” with no self-awareness of their own hackery. And it should be noted that these hosts present their own unacknowledged bias in the most manipulative and disgusting way possible: pretending they represent objective truths and can speak with authority on matters for which they have no training. In contrast, the “cranks” they attack are open, honest, and respectable people with decades of experience as criminal litigators, and who invite conversation and acknowledge when they might be wrong or overly biased about something. And to dispel any notion that I have a hidden motivation for writing this, rather than a true dislike for this podcast, let me be clear that I have zero connection, communication, or personal affection with or for the “cranks.” I think these hosts need to take some time off, touch grass, and re-examine things a little.

The only thing keeping me from a 5 star review is how terrible their add reads are! Omg please put some life into them Zzzzzz The Delphi coverage was outstanding

They claim to be unbiased journalists, but share their opinions too much. I liked listening at first to get factual information. During interviews, Aine repeats the word “absolutely “ after every response by the interviewee. Such an unnecessary filler word. They have become best buds with notorious plagiarizer, Jayson, yet accuse others of plagiarism. They seem to have gotten their feelings hurt by an old senile attorney and can’t let it go. Has gotten even worse. Update: Their latest episode is nothing but gossip repeating terrible things other “creators” have said to each other. When I commented on their “discussion “ group that 3 episodes of bashing other people and sharing the disgusting things other creators said, made them no better than the others, they blocked me. They are not journalists, just gossip mongers. They only want facebook group members who will gush praise and worship on them. They are too immature to take any constructive criticism. If they were truly better they would stick to facts and encourage intelligent discussion. They just want praise and adulation from their listeners. Listened to their after trial interviews. They have no problem with defendants rights being violated. I still don’t know if the guy was guilty. Too much reasonable doubt and his pretrial treatment was horrendous. These 2 were obviously working with state to support its narrative.

This is a real review. Recent reviews of the Murder Sheet have prompted me to share my experience of this podcast, from a longtime listener perspective. Bottom line, The Murder Sheet podcast goes the distance to find primary source material to support their perspective. If you disagree with their perspective, go read the transcript or police report and think for yourself. I’ve been listening to this podcast consistently for years. It is a staple in my podcast library as a neutral place that I can rely on for an accurate recount of true crime cases. These guys (Áine & Kevin) are a powerhouse couple that combine their journalistic & lawyeristic skills to ethically report on complex issues without sensationalism.

Lawyer educated at Notre Dame. Your interviews of all involved brought such texture to the city, county, state and most importantly, the girls.

We heard a juror, essentially admit to all the reasonable doubt but vote guilty just because. The constant giggles, talking about how she took her Polaroid with her, as if she was going on a holiday, not to decide a man’s fate but a disgusting, and the hosts say nothing? They just encourage this dumb girl to keep talking about how she failed as a juror. Why the hosts didn’t tell her there were other suspects, the judge didn’t allow the defense to talk about it? Why didn’t the hosts tell this juror how the judge violated RA right to a fair trial and because of that, she handed the defense the appeal on a silver plater.

I’ve listened for a long time, but the work on the Delphi case is top notch. The first person interviews- holy cow- they’re asking educated, but respectful questions.

I love this podcast. Aine and Kevin make a great team. Aine’s journalistic approach works well with Kevin’s legal background. They have a great chemistry and are very well informed. Their coverage of the Delphi case was phenomenal. They have integrity and class.

I love the way they research and present their episodes but when there is a guest speaker I cannot clearly hear the guest speaker. Their voices come across clear and strong but the guest speaker always sounds garbled and in and out. Hopefully this is a connect or equipment issue that they will look at and resolve. I couldn’t listen to the Delphi jury episodes because it was driving me crazy with how much intensity I had to use to try to listen to the guest speaker so I stopped. Other than that when it’s just the two of them, it’s great.

I used to love this show when I felt it was unbiased and informative. I stopped listening for a very long time because of this but came back to hear the Delphi juror interview’s. However, these are also leading and for personal show. I don’t even feel that Richard Allen is innocent but would love to hear an interview that doesn’t lead discussion that way, which yours does not. I would love o hear more fact and less opinions.

They are always so well informed!

Lawyers have a duty of candor and ethics. Hope this guy isn’t practicing - clearly doesn’t understand criminal law. Very biased reporting only spinning one side. Do the victims, the process, the law and your audience a favor by reporting accurate info without your obvious bias. Sheesh, this one is rough to listen to.

Extremely one-sided coverage of the Delphi murders, served with a heaping side of unwarranted condescension. Hard pass.

Very interesting, but the juror’s audio was fuzzy for some reason

I really wanted to find a podcast that gives play by play of the trial. I tried so hard to keep listening to these two, but they are not engaging whatsoever, sound quality is bad, information could be delivered in a more organized manner. I get it, they are tired and it does seem like the rules for getting a seat in the courtroom is unnecessarily rigid & I appreciate the lengths they are going to essentially bring us into the courtroom and that is why I gave them 3 stars instead of 2. Edit: I had to change my rating to one star as I don’t appreciate their condescending tone. It’s absolutely disgusting and can’t believe that people actually enjoy listening.

The interview with the unidentified Delphi juror was fascinating. I am so glad you did not name her as I worry about juror harassment-I wrote a thank you to the jurors for their service and hope this juror saw that. Enjoying very much your First Person series. You guys are the bomb.

Great juror interview ! The best, straight forward reporting of the Delphi trial that I have found. Thank you for all your hard work.

Could you say uh and ummm just a few more times?